Supporters--Listed by Graduation Year

Mike Teskey, Honorary Alum

Former Director of Alumni Relations

Jay Hubert, 1966

Alumni Admissions Representative 1985 - present

Gift Chair 40th reunion committee (class of '66) 2005 - 2006

AFR Steering Committee (chair Griffin Working Group) 2006 - present

Member of Alumni Board 2006 - 2012

President of Alumni Association 2010 - 2011

Alumni Trustee 2012 - 2017

Co-chair 50th reunion committee (class of '66) 2015 - 2016

AB Nominating Committee 2018 - 2019

David Hardey, 1971

Alumni Board Member

Scott Foster, 1977

Alumni Trustee 2017-present; President, Alumni Association Board 2014-15; Alumni Board Member and Chair, Reunions Committee 2009-14; ’77 Class Reunion Coordinator, 2007; Washington DC Chapter Representative 1996-99.

Rich Roher, 1979

Past President & AB member

Tony Fisher, 1980

Past President & AB member

Konrad Alt, 1981

John Sheehy, 1982

Alumni Board member 1997-2004

Oral History Committee Chair 1998-2012

Past Alumni Presidents Committee 2005-current

Trustee 2009-current

Stephanie Watson, 1982

I am a former alumni board member, secretary, vice president, two-term alumni board president, one-term former alumni board president, and a former alumni trustee and Babson Award recipient

Dave Baxter, 1987

Past Admission Volunteer, Reunions Co-Chair, Current and Past DC Chapter Chair, Current Alumni Board Member.  Part of the DC steering organization off and on for the last 20 years, Served on AB in the past.

Sebastian Pastore, 1988

Past Alumni Board member

Meisha (Berman) Rosenberg, 1993

Lisa Saldana, 1994
At-Large AB Director, Nominations Committee, Reunions Chair for Centennial, Reunions Chair, Class Leader (2 xs), Mentoring Program (MeetUps, phone calls, review of resumes, etc), Working Weekend Participant, Leadership Summit Participant, Summer Internship Site, Participated in my Chapter the whopping 2 years that I lived in a Chapter city way back when, AB Secretary, AB VP, AB President 

Esteban Gutierrez, 1994

Former Portland Chapter Chair and AB member

Dylan Rivera, 1995

Alumni Board 2001-04, Alumni Trustee 2015-present (serving on Alumni Board and Board of Trustees), Alumni Fundraising for Reed Steering Committee 2016-present, 20^th Reunion Co-chair, Founder of Reedies Drink Reedie Wine for Reed, Winter Shadows host, career networking volunteer.

Patrick Sullivan, 2000

Alumni Board At-large Director

Darlene Pasieczny, 2001

At-Large Director on Alumni Board for the prior three years, during which time the Board conducted self-assessments and had numerous opportunities for stakeholder discussions about desired improvements and restructuring. Current Alumni Trustee.  Former chair of Reed Career Alliance and active current committee member.  Member of Reed Legal Network and active organizer / participant in events for students and alumni interested in the law.  Working Weekend participant, and co-founder of Reed Alumni Career Coaches, connecting interested alumni of any age or stage in their career with alumni volunteer coaches.

Kristen Earl, 2005

Past President Reed College Alumni Association

AB At-large Member 2007–10

AB Nominations Committee 2010–11

Reed College Oral History Project Chapter Coordinator 2008–10

AB Executive Committee 2013–17

Babson Society Outstanding Volunteer Award 2017

Amanda Waldroupe, 2007

Current Portland Chapter Chair (April 2018-present), Alumni Board At-Large Member (April 2018-present), 5th Reunion Steering Committee (2012)

Andrei Stephens, 2008

Alumni Board Member

Eira May, 2008

Alumni Board Member

Seyram Butame, 2008

Sasha Shyduroff, 2008

Zoë Vrabel, 2009

Caroll Casbeer, 2010

Erica Shannon, 2010

Emily Corso, 2010

Jinyoung Park, 2011

Current Alumni Board Vice President, Peer Mentor Program Alumni Advisory Board member, past Admission volunteer, past local host and outreach volunteer in New Orleans.

Danielle Crabtree, 2011

Matt Hagen, 2011

Lauren Moore, 2011

Justina Thoreson, 2011

Henry Hays-Wehle, 2011

Amelia Harati 2011

Jillian Jackson, 2011

David Nielsen, 2011

Adrien Schless-Meier 2012

Adriel Hsu-Flanders, 2012

Liz Rutledge-Shryock, 2012

Axcelle Bell, 2012

Amelia Goldsmith, 2012

Molly Case, 2012

Current At-Large member of the Reed Alumni Board, Reed RELAY mentor,  former Orientation Coordinator and Admission Intern, recipient of the Mellon Environmental Studies Summer Fellowship, Centennial Celebration speaker and student body representative.

Melissa Osborne 2013

Alumni Board Secretary, At-Large Member (2015-18), Co-Chair of the Diversity and Inclusion Committee (2017-Present), Chair of the Outreach Committee (2016-17), Peer Mentor Program Alumni Advisory Board Co-Chair (2016-Present).

Kelly Reed, 2013 

Alumni Board member

Carlie Stolz, 2013

Alumni Fundraising for Reed and working on developing a Chapter in Austin

Brittany Wideman, 2013

Colin Townes-Anderson, 2013

Shabab Ahmed Mirza, 2013

Currently: Peer Mentor Program Alumni Advisory Board member; non-voting member of the Diversity and Inclusion Committee of the Reed Alumni Board. Formerly: MRC Intern, House Advisor, student senator.

Aaron Smith, 2013

Marvin Bernardo, 2013

Ian Flower, 2013

Katelyn Best, 2013

Robert Rutledge-Shryock 2013

Alan Montecillo, 2013

Finn Terdal, 2013

Emma Mclean-Riggs, 2014

Alumni Board member

Erica Maranowski 2014

Archit Guha, 2014

Audrey Humphrey, 2014

Chiara Packard, 2014

Amina Rahman, 2014

Sasha Peters, 2015

Cybele Brandow, 2015

Evvu Archibald, 2015

Anika Ledlow, 2015

Dean Schmeltz, 2015

Sita Goetschius, 2015

Rennie Meyers, 2015

Cris Cambianica, 2016

Michael Bernard, 2016

Alo Patchen, 2017

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's) about Referendum

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 
Reed College Alumni Board Bylaw Changes

Is it true that the Alumni Board voted to remove all the chapter leaders from the Alumni Board when it met on June 8th?
No. It is true that on June 8th the Alumni Board voted to make a number of changes to its constitution and bylaws in a proposed amendment. One of those changes involves no longer automatically allowing a representative from each recognized chapter to serve on the board, without any standardized term limits or without going through the nominations vetting process.
Instead, the amendment allows for three board seats reserved for “Chapter Directors,” who will have full voting privileges as board members, and one-year terms renewable up to three years. Chapter Directors will be nominated by a newly created Chapter Steering Organization, which will be self-governed by the chapters, with staff and financial support from the college. The nominations process and three-year term maximum for Chapter Directors is in line with existing At-Large Director nominations and service terms.

Were there any other changes to the constitution and bylaws that the Alumni Board voted on?
Yes. In addition to the changes specific to Chapter Directors, the amendment approved by the Alumni Board includes:

1. Creation of three committees in alignment with the College and other Alumni bodies (e.g., Alumni Fundraising for Reed). Committees will necessarily evolve as priorities evolve. Currently, the three committees include: The Committee for Young Alumni, The Diversity and Inclusion Committee, and the Reed Career Alliance.
2. Opening up membership on Board committees—including the Reed Career Alliance, the Committee for Young Alumni, and the Diversity and Inclusion Committees—to all Reed alumni, not just members of the Alumni Board.
3. Requiring all board members to serve on one of the Board committees, which annually set goals that are measurable.
4. The board now will be allowed to use email, the Internet, and other forms of technology for communication and voting (the old constitution specified that “print” communications be the only method to communicate).
5. Cleaning up language of the constitution and bylaws for consistency across governing documents.

Why are these changes being made?

Improving the functionality of the Alumni Board has been an identified issue for some time. In 2016, a professional independent survey was conducted of the entire Alumni Board, and the results indicated that members wanted more organizational direction, better communication, and less duplication of service work.
As the Alumni Association grows and the needs of alumni evolve, the Alumni Board’s work is also changing. It used to be the case that the board focused much of its work on Reunions and alumni programming at set events.

Now, the Alumni Board’s work is multi-faceted. It is working to build stronger relationships with young alumni and ensure that the needs of alumni and other members of the Reed community from diverse, marginalized, and underrepresented groups are being identified, heard, and addressed through alumni networks.

Why aren’t all chapters being included in these changes to the board?

The chapters have always focused their efforts on the needs of, and engaging with, their local alumni. The chapter leaders spend a huge amount of effort working to emphasize work that is important to their local constituents. This might or might not align with the needs identified by the board for the larger alumni community.
The current structure allows for a good deal of time in the board meetings to focus on chapter activities. The proposed amendment will allow for overview updates from the three Chapter Directors and coordination with board committee projects, but otherwise allow the Chapter Steering Organization to focus on details about chapter events. Chapters will no longer be required to sit through board meetings regarding information that is not relevant to their activities, and vice versa.
By separating out a Chapter Steering Organization from the Alumni Board, the Alumni Board hopes that both entities will be more mission-driven, streamlined and efficient.
The Alumni Board, as well as staff of Alumni Programs, hope that these changes will strengthen the support for local chapters.

Does this mean that the chapter leaders no longer have a voice on the Alumni Board?

Absolutely not. See below.

So, how will the chapter leaders continue to have a voice on the Alumni Board?

The chapters will have their own steering organization, which will be made up of all of the chapter leaders. Out of that organization, the chapters will nominate representatives for three Chapter Director seats on the Alumni Board. These nominations will be submitted to the nominations committee in the same manner as other Director seats. ​The three reserved chapter seats will only be filled by chapter representatives​​. If the Chapters do not nominate three representatives, the seats will remain unfilled.

What else can you tell me about that Chapter Steering Organization?

Much is still to be determined—by the chapter leaders. The organization will be self-governed by chapter leaders, and they will be responsible for writing their own operating documents (if they choose to have any), and determining how best to serve the needs of chapter leaders and chapters. The Chapter Steering Organization also will will take over the responsibility of recognizing new chapters, and decommissioning inactive chapters. Currently the expansion and contraction of new chapters is governed by the Alumni Board, posing limitations to how nimble this process can be, and causing barriers for chapters to smoothly evolve as concentrated areas of alumni build. The new amendment will allow the chapters to use their knowledge and assessment of what regions are best suited for chapter activities.

What else can you tell me about the support the chapter leaders will get?

The Chapter Steering Organization will receive financial support and staff support from the college. The college has expressed commitment to helping the chapters succeed. And, of course, the three Chapter Directors on the Alumni Board can bring chapter matters to the attention of the full board, and collaborate with board committees.

How long have these changes been discussed?

The Alumni Board, including the chapter representatives, have formally been discussing these changes, as well as other proposals, for a year and a half. The idea of the need for change and the decision to move forward formally was initially raised in June 2016.

• ●  2014-2015 Year The then Vice President of the Alumni Board chaired a group to review the constitution and bylaws and consider areas for update, need for consistency, and functioning.
• ●  Fall 2015: ​The then President of the Alumni Board, during weekly phone meetings with the Director of Alumni Relations, started exploring the question of whether the Alumni Board was a good model of governance, after chairing the task force/committee on revising the Constitution and the bylaws.​ This led to a meeting of several past Presidents of the Alumni Board and the Director of the Alumni Relations, where they discussed the rapidly broadening scope of activities involving the alumni association, as well as whether the board's existing structure and function were adequate to meet the growth.
• ●  January 2016: The most recent past president, put together a document with recommendations, based on input from multiple past presidents, on how we might organize volunteer efforts within the Reed alumni association in a way that can support the myriad of activities and the volunteers that are involved in said activities.
• ●  June 2016: Joint decision between the then Executive Committee and Alumni Relations to consider putting the past president recommendations into action.
• ●  Early 2017: an "alumni board self-assessment" was conducted by an external consultant, Doyle-White, where she sent every board member a survey with a few questions and conducted phone interviews with everyone who was available.
• ●  May 2017: the then Executive Committee of the Alumni Board met in person with Alumni Programs staff and Doyle-White to review the survey results with respect to the past presidents’ report on board structure and in light of the college’s increased staff support for the Alumni Board and wish for greater alignment of board activity with needs and goals of college.
• ●  June 2017 (Reunions board meeting): Doyle-White shared the findings of the board self-assessment with the board at large. The Executive Committee shared its proposal on the board restructure and conducted focus groups with board members to receive input and incorporate modifications.
• ●  September 2017 (board meeting on campus): Doyle-White joined the board meeting again for a more in-depth discussion of the survey results. There were discussions about the proposed changes to the board structure (and related changes to the constitution/bylaws). It was determined that further input and discussion was needed before moving to a vote.
• ●  November 2017: Discussed the proposal again with the entire board during the board meeting conference call.
• ●  February 2018: The Executive Committee incorporated the feedback and sent out an updated version of the proposal. A dedicated conference call was conducted for discussion. Some board members wanted to submit new proposals of their own. The board decided to entertain new proposals until April 16, 2018. A working group was established to review all of the proposals and make tracked changes to the existing constitution and bylaws.
  ●  Between February and April 2018: Four people submitted proposals.

• ●  April 2018: Board discussed the new proposals and provided feedback. Authors of the proposals
  were invited to review/edit their proposal and send the new version to the working group. Working group reviewed the proposals with the constitution. It was decided to schedule the vote on the proposals in the June meeting.
• ●  Between April and June 2018: The Executive Committee merged its proposal with two of the new proposals with the permission of the authors of those proposals, which resulted in a total of three proposals on the table to be voted on in June.
• ●  June 2018 board meeting: Discussion took place before the vote, during which one of the authors of the proposals withdrew their proposal, leaving a remaining 2 proposals. 25 voting members were present. 20 people voted in favor of the proposal authored by the Executive Committee and 5 people voted for the other proposal. Amendments to the Constitution require a two-thirds vote of those present at a board meeting. They also need to be published to the alumni at large, and the amendments will take effect 30 days after publication, if the alumni office does not receive written objections from 50 or more alumni.
  
  What was the vote tally that approved the amendment?
  
  Of the 25 voting members of the Alumni Board in attendance at the June 8 meeting, both in person and by telephonic appearance, 20 members voted in favor of the approved amendment and 5 members voted for another proposal (80% in favor). Of note, there were 8 chapter leaders present and therefore, a minimum of three voted in favor of the approved amendment.
  
  What’s the next step?
  
  The amendments have been published in the Reed Magazine September issue. The alumni at- large has the opportunity to write-in an opposition to the amendment within 30 days of publication (please send a letter to the Alumni Programs Office, Prexy, 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd, Portland, OR 97202 to be received by October 15). The amendment will take effect 30 days after publication unless 50 or more written objections are received:
  
  Current Constitution (Relevant Portion)
  
  ARTICLEVIII Amendments
  Section 1. ​​Amendments to this constitution may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of those present at any meeting of the board of directors. Such amendments shall be published as soon as practicable in a college publication sent to all members of the Alumni Association.
  Section 2. ​​The amendment will take effect 30 days after publication in accordance with Section 1 unless, prior to that date, the alumni office receives written objections from 50 or more members of the Alumni Association.
  Section 3. ​​If the alumni office receives written objections from 50 or more members of the Alumni Association within 30 days after publication in accordance with Section 1, a ballot of the members of the Alumni Association will be held. The board of directors shall supervise the balloting.

Statement of Support for Changes to Reed's Constitution

We, the majority of the current Alumni Board, including all officers and Alumni Trustees, thank the entire Reed Alumni Association community for taking an interest and voting.  We appreciate your participation and will respect the referendum’s outcome. We ask you to approve these updates to our governing documents. Your vote matters!    

Hopefully, you’ve read the full redline changes approved by the Board. Mischaracterizations have circulated in our community. Constitutional change can sound precipitous. When feeling uncertain, it’s a natural inclination, even among Reedies, to keep the status quo.  

The approved referendum was anything but casually considered; the status quo is not serving us well.  The changes resulted from more than three years of research, self-assessments, meetings, and discussions involving the entire Alumni Board, Chapter leaders, past Board presidents and alumni trustees, other alumni, and the College.  The Constitution and bylaws structure the Board and its ability to serve the Alumni community.  Updating them benefits the community.

Proposed changes make the governing documents internally consistent, modernized, and expand opportunities for alumni participation.  The changes create a self-governing Chapter Steering Organization – while maintaining dedicated Chapter representation.  This latter change is a point of contention.  Regrettably, these amendments have been cast by some as a secretive, malicious act to disenfranchise the role of Chapter leadership. Nothing could be further from the truth.  

So, it’s fair to ask, why the changes?  Some key benefits are:

• Chapters will gain increased college support focusing on localized activities, while being able to define their own membership and self-governing collective, with a fair representative voice on the Board through three dedicated seats.
• Streamlining of the Board’s organization, with national focus and scope, and greater emphasis on strategic planning activities rather than informational reporting.
• Expansion of alumni participation opportunities, including ability to serve in leadership roles in Chapters and committees through reasonable term limits and ad hoc membership.
• Modernized language permits electronic communication (rather than only hard copy print) in official notices and flexibility for electronic voting, clarifies textual ambiguities, and matches historical practices.

As part of the long self-assessment process that identified structural concerns, Board members were encouraged to submit their own proposals. Those few members most vocally opposed to the approved changes offered alternatives that were not endorsed by the majority director membership. While we believe the changes will be successful in promoting a stronger alumni volunteer community and do not take the amendment process lightly, the Board will reassess again should the changes not achieve their positive objectives. 

We believe the changes expand both Board’s impact on and participation by the greater alumni community. The large majority (80%) of current Board members wholly supported these changes and the process that brought them forth.  .  The votes by the alumni community will determine whether they are implemented or not.  We urge you to vote “yes.”

Authored by:

Dave Baxter, '87, Chapter Leader

Darlene Pasieczny, '01, Alumni Trustee

Rich Roher, '79, Past President

Andrei Stephens, '08, At-Large Director

Endorsed by:  Executive Committee